Sally,
Thank you for your timely Blog reply.
I must say, I find it rather confusing, and I hope that, once again, you’ll consider a lengthier and more formal and detailed response in the next issue.
As is readily apparent, some candidate’s statements were longer than the 250 word limit. On this blog, there were three candidates that posted replies to the original Ricki Carroll post mentioning such a limit, and their compliance.
Was the decision made at the editor’s level to ignore this limit for some? Did you consider notifying these three people (David King, Karen Sullivan, and Emily Robertson) that you might consider longer statements from them, given that you approved longer statements from others?
Thank you in advance for considering to offer a clarification of your earlier remarks.
I remain...
A devoted reader...
Paul Swem
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment