Saturday, June 19, 2010

Geography Quiz - Test Your Knowledge

QUESTIONS based on ranking in the 50 states from largest to smallest.

1. Where does Massachusetts rank in land mass? (a) 42, (b) 37, (c) 45

2. Where does Massachusetts rank in population? (a) 29, (b) 14, (c) 25

3. Where does Massachusetts rank in density? (a) 22, (b) 3, (c) 11

4. Where does New Hampshire rank in population? (a) 41, (b) 34, (c) 38

5. Where does Vermont rank in population? (a) 45, (b) 49, ( c) 42

6. Where does Minnesota rank in population? (a) 29, (b) 15, (c) 21

ANSWERS

1. The answer is (c). Massachusetts has the 45th smallest land mass in the country followed by New Jersey, Hawaii, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Delaware.

2. The answer is (b). Massachusetts ranks 14th with a population of about 6.5 million people.

3. The answer is (b). Massachusetts ranks 3rd in density with about 825 people per square mile. Only New Jersey and Rhode Island are more crowded.

4. The answer is (a). New Hampshire ranks 41st with a population of about 1.3 million. New Hampshire ranks 21st in density with approximately 147 people per square mile.

5. The answer is (b). Vermont ranks 49th with a population of about 680,000. Vermont ranks 30th in density with approximately 67 people per square mile.

6. The answer is (c). Minnesota ranks 21st with a population of about 5.2 million. Minnesota ranks 31st in density with approximately 65 people per square mile.

Source: WorldAtlas.com
Submitted by Amelia Maloney

1 comment:

  1. Gee,

    Massachusetts is one of the smallest land masses, one of the highest ranking with population, and top 3rd in density compared to other surrounding states and such. And we what in the Berkshires??? We need 1000 windmills for the greater good of the union again?

    Given those figures, it would seem Massachusetts would tip over as we are way out of balance vs providing other states and Eastern MA with 'goods'.

    I would think drowning towns for the greater good is enough to ask from Boston. I quote from an article "Metropolitan Boston's demand for fresh water began to outstrip its local supplies in the early part of the nineteenth century".

    It is the only time Boston feels a need to travel west - lets take. The last time it was Western MA's water. Now it is lets go to Western MA for our energy needs, Wind Turbines!

    Perhaps we should all go over to Quabbin and turn the water facet off for Boston until they rethink energy conservation on individual basis.

    ReplyDelete